Fox Shiver LLC v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint,

DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Fox Shiver LLC, XYZ Corp. against Narges Tankbris, Shameem Aslam in the amount of $ 50000.00., Motions terminated: [212] MOTION for Default Judgment as to StitchSpire. filed by Fox Shiver LLC., IT IS HEREBY FOUND, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. The Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. �� 1331 and 1338 and 17 U.S.C. � 101 et seq., and personal jurisdiction over StitchSpire. StitchSpire contracted with New York-based Etsy to operate an interactive online storefront, paid Etsy listing and sales fees, and offered a digital file containing Plaintiff's artwork for purchase and digital delivery to consumers in New York. 2. By virtue of its default, StitchSpire admits the well-pleaded allegations of the Complaint concerning liability. Plaintiff owns a valid copyright in the artwork entitled "Not Today" (the "Subject Work"), U.S. Copyright Registration No. VA0002240645. As further set forth in this Order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 6. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against StitchSpire is GRANTED.7. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff Fox Shiver LLC andagainst Defendant StitchSpire in the total amount of $102,500, consisting of:a. $50,000 in statutory damages under 17 U.S.C. � 504(c)(2) for StitchSpire'swillful infringement of the Subject Work; and as further set forth in this Order. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Judgment and Permanent Injunction. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Shameem Aslam d/b/a Stitchspire as Defendant in this case, to mail a copy of this Order to Defendants Shameen Aslam d/b/a StitchSpire and Narges Tankbris d/b/a JooJooArtStore, and to terminate ECF No. 212. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/8/2026) Shameem Aslam and Narges Tankbris terminated.

ORDER granting [208] Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application GRANTED. Plaintiff's default judgment motion shall be due on September 8, 2026. As before, StitchSpire shall file any opposition no later than three weeks from the motion's filing. Additionally, the show-cause hearing is hereby RESCHEDULED for October 8, 2026, at 4:30 p.m. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 208 and to mail a copy of this endorsed letter to Shameen Aslam d/b/a StitchSpire and Narges Tankbris d/b/a JooJooArtStore. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 8/10/2026)

ORDER: Defendant StichSpire is in default. See ECF No. 198. Plaintiff shall file any motion for default judgment, in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases (available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman), within two weeks of the date of this Order. Plaintiff should familiarize itself with Local Civil Rules 55.1 and 55.2, which, along with Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 4(J) of the Court's Individual Rules, govern default judgment motion practice before this Court. If Plaintiff's counsel submits calculations in support of any motion for default judgment, counsel shall also email native versions of the files with the calculations (i.e., versions of the files in their original format, such as in ".xlsx") to Furman_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov. If or when a motion for default judgment is filed, the Court will enter a further Order setting a deadline for any opposition and reply and scheduling a show cause hearing. If no motion for default judgment is filed by the deadline set forth above, the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice to the parties. StitchSpire shall file any opposition to the motion for default judgment no later than three weeks from its filing. Stitchspire is reminded that corporate entities may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel, see Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007), and where such an entity "repeatedly fails to appear by counsel, a default judgment may be entered against it," Grace v. Bank Leumi Tr. Co. of N.Y., 443 F.3d 180, 192 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). That said, although "courts generally do not allow corporations, partnerships, associations, and other artificial entities to appear in court without an attorney," courts have "allow[ed] sole proprietorships to proceed pro se because a sole proprietorship has no legal existence apart from its owner." Scales v. Design Nortex, No. 23-CV-6442 (LTS), 2024 WL 21909, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2024) (internal quotation marks omitted). Thus, if StitchSpire is not a sole proprietorship and appears without counsel, the Court may proceed to enter default judgment against StichSpire regardless of its appearance. It is further ORDERED that Defendant StitchSpire appear and show cause before this Court on September 10, 2026, at 4:00 p.m., why an order should not be issued granting a default judgment against it. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the conference will be held remotely by telephone in accordance with Paragraph 3.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. The parties should join the conference by calling the Court's dedicated conference line at (855) 244-8681 and using access code 2303 019 3884, followed bythe pound (#) key. When prompted for an attendee ID number, press the pound (#) key again. No later than Thursday the week prior to the conference date, Plaintiff must file the proposed default judgment order electronically, using the ECF Filing Event "Proposed Default Judgment," for the Clerk's approval. In the event that StitchSpire appears or opposes the motion for default judgment prior to that date, the parties shall prepare to treat that conference as the initial pretrial conference with respect to StitchSpire. That is, if StitchSpire appears, opposes the motion, or seeks a nunc pro tunc extension of time to respond to the complaint, then the parties - including StitchSpire -- shall follow the pre-conference procedures specified in the Court's Order of April 6, 2026, including by submitting a joint letter addressing certain topics and a proposed case management plan no later than the Thursday prior to the conference. See ECF No. 182. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order electronically and/or by first-class mail on Defendant StichSpire within two business days from the date of this Order and shall file proof of such service within three business days of the date of this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 7/28/2026) Show Cause Hearing set for 9/10/2026 at 04:00 PM before Judge Jesse M. Furman.

DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against Apolinariaa; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against ArtbyJaims; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against ArtofBirdiee; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against BAGTIANCIAGA; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against BestWishesFromFL; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against CarronsCreations; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against InkDesignJS; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against KamillaDesignStore; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against LeadBellyBenny; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against Littleworkplace; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against MagicMerchEmporium; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against OneStepHappy; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against RickandMel1; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against sinclothing; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against TheArtisanPaws; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against TimaShopDesigns; in favor of InkDesignJS against VerityFashion; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against WaysofWhimsy; in favor of Fox Shiver LLC against Zenorbstudio., Motions terminated: [176] MOTION for Default Judgment as to Apolinariaa, ArtbyJaims, ArtofBirdiee, BAGTIANCIAGA, BestWishesFromFL, CarronsCreations, InkDesignJS, KamillaDesignStore, LeadBellyBenny, LiluBazars, LiteraryLoveliesUK, Littleworkplace, MagentaByGerry, OHMYGATO filed by Fox Shiver LLC.THIS ACTION, having been commenced Fox Shiver LLC ("Plaintiff") against the Defendants identified on Schedule A, and that certain Defendants identified in Appendix A to this Order have defaulted (collectively, the "Subject Defendants"), who operated storefronts (the "Online Storefronts") through Etsy, Inc. (the "Service Provider") through which the Subject Defendants commercially exploited one or more works of art, to which Plaintiff owns the copyrights in connection with physical products or digital files bearing/containing one or more Subject Works (the "Infringing Products"); and Plaintiff having moved for entry of Default Judgment against the Subject Defendants; This Court having entered, upon a showing by Plaintiff, a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the Subject Defendants that included an asset restraining order, for their offering for sale of the Infringing Products exploiting one or more of the works of art owned by Plaintiff, as identified in Appendix B to this Order (the "Subject Works"); Plaintiff properly completed service of process on the Subject Defendants either waived service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d), were served personally, or were served through alternative means, namely email, as previously permitted by the Court; The Subject Defendants, and each of them, have been afforded ample time and opportunity to answer and present their objections; None of the Subject Defendants having answered the Complaint or appeared in any way, and the time for answering the Complaint having expired; THIS COURT FINDS that it has personal jurisdiction over the Subject Defendants because the Subject Defendants (a) directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including New York, offering to sell and ship products into this Judicial District. Specifically, the Subject Defendants are reaching out to do business with New York residents by operating one or more commercial, interactive Online Storefronts through which New York residents can purchase products bearing counterfeit versions of products utilizing one or more of the Subject Works; As further set forth in this Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED in its entirety, that Default Judgment is entered against the Subject Defendants, as specified herein. Accordingly, this Court ORDERS that: 1. The Subject Defendants, their affiliates, officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, confederates, and all persons acting for, with, by, through, under or in active concert with them be permanently enjoined and restrained from: a. Using the Subject Works, or any reproductions, counterfeit copies, or colorable imitations thereof in any manner in connection with the distribution, marketing, advertising, offering for sale, or sale of any products, including the Infringing Products; b. Passing off, inducing, or enabling others to sell or pass off any product as a genuine product of Plaintiff's and/or not produced under the authorization, control, or supervision of Plaintiff and approved by Plaintiff for sale pursuant to Plaintiff's copyrights to the Subject Works; c. Committing any acts calculated to cause consumers to believe that Defendants' Infringing Products are sold under the authorization, control, or supervision of Plaintiff, or are sponsored by, approved by, or otherwise connected with Plaintiff; d. Further infringing Plaintiff's copyrights to the Subject Works and damaging Plaintiff's goodwill; e. Shipping, delivering, holding for sale, transferring, or otherwise moving, storing, distributing, returning, or otherwise disposing of, in any manner, products or inventory not manufactured by or for Plaintiff, nor authorized by Plaintiff to be sold or offered for sale, and which bear the Subject Works, any reproductions, counterfeit copies, or colorable imitations thereof; 2. Within five (5) days of receipt of this Order, Etsy, and any other Third-Party Providers are directed to: a. Disable any listings identified by Plaintiff in writing as incorporating or displaying the Subject Works; b. disable any advertisements promoting listings identified by Plaintiff in writing as incorporating or displaying the Subject Works; and c. take reasonable steps to remove or de-index such listings from search results within their respective platforms. 3. Those in privity with the Subject Defendants, and with actual notice of this Order,including Third-Party Providers, such as PayPal, Wish, Payoneer, social media platforms, Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, Twitter, Internet search engines such as Google, shall within three (3) business days of receipt of this Order: a. disable or suspend the specific listings identified by Plaintiff in writing as incorporating or displaying the Subject Works; b. disable and cease displaying any advertisements used by or associated with the Subject Defendants in connection with the sale of counterfeit and infringing goods using the Subject Works; and c. cease providing payment processing or other transaction-related services in connection with sales of products offered through listings identified by Plaintiff in writing as incorporating or displaying the Subject Works. As further set forth in this Order 8. Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. � 504(c), Plaintiff is awarded statutory damages against each of the Subject Defendants in the amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) per Subject Work infringed, with the total damages awarded against each Subject Defendant set forth in Appendix C attached hereto, which itemizes each Subject Defendant and the corresponding damages award. 9. All monies currently restrained in the Subject Defendants' financial accounts, including monies held by Etsy, the Service Providers, any Financial Institutions, or any other Third-Party Provider are hereby released to Plaintiff as partial payment of the above-identified damages, and the Service Providers, the Financial Institutions, and any other Third-Party Provider are ordered to release to Plaintiff the amounts from the Subject Defendants' accounts, including any Connected Accounts, within ten (10) business days of receipt of this Order. 10. Partial payments made pursuant to this Order shall not constitute full satisfaction of the judgment unless and until the total amount awarded, including post-judgment interest, has been fully paid. Plaintiff may pursue collection of any remaining balance through all available means, including but not limited to continuing enforcement actions against the Subject Defendants, the issuance of additional restraining orders against newly discovered accounts or assets, and any further proceedings necessary to ensure full satisfaction of the judgment. 11. In the event Plaintiff identifies additional accounts owned or operated by any Subject Defendant that are used to offer for sale products incorporating the Subject Works, Plaintiff may provide notice of this Order to the relevant third-party service providers, which shall comply with this Order with respect to such accounts upon receiving actual notice. 12. In the event that Plaintiff identifies any additional online marketplace accounts, storefronts, domain names, or financial accounts owned by any Subject Defendant, Plaintiff may send notice of any supplemental proceeding to the Subject Defendant by email at the email addresses identified by Plaintiff, and any email addresses provided by third parties as being owned or used by the Subject Defendant. 13. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. � 1961, post-judgment interest shall accrue on the total monetary award, including damages, attorneys' fees, and costs, at the rate set forth by federal law, from the date of entry of this Judgment until the total amount is fully paid. The applicable rate of post-judgment interest shall be calculated as provided in 28 U.S.C. � 1961(a), based on the weekly average one-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, for the calendar week preceding the date of entry of this Judgment. Such interest shall be compounded annually, as required by 28 U.S.C. � 1961(b). The Subject Defendants shall be responsible for the payment of post-judgment interest without the necessity of further action by the court or the prevailing party. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 176. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/7/2026)

ORDER re: [182] Order to Show Cause. On April 6, 2026, the Court ordered various Defendants to appear and show cause on May 5, 2026, at 4:00 p.m., why an order should not be issued granting a default judgment against them. See ECF No. 182. That hearing is hereby RESCHEDULED for 2:30 p.m. on that same date. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the conference will be held remotely by telephone in accordance with Paragraph 3.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. The parties should join the conference by calling the Court's dedicated conference line at (855) 244-8681 and using access code 2303 019 3884, followed by the pound (#) key. When prompted for an attendee ID number, press the pound (#) key again. Fox Shiver is hereby ordered to serve each of the Subject Defendants with a copy of this Order within one business day of its filing and file proof of service on ECF within two business days of service. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Defendants Shameen Aslam d/b/a StitchSpire, Narges Tankbris d/b/a JooJooArtStore, and Ohmygatosla. SO ORDERED. (Telephone Conference set for 5/5/2026 at 02:30 PM before Judge Jesse M. Furman.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/29/2026)

ORDER : Pursuant to the Courts April 6, 2026 Order, various Defendants in this action were ordered to file any opposition to Plaintiffs pending motion for a default judgment no later than April 24, 2026, and to appear for a show-cause hearing on May 5, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. See ECF No. 182. On April 23, 2026, one of those Defendants, Ohmygatosla, filed an opposition to the pending default judgment motion. See ECF No. 186. In light Ohmygatosla's opposition, and consistent with the Court's prior Order, ECF No. 182, the parties should be prepared to treat the upcoming show-cause hearing as an initial pretrial conference with respect to this Defendant. To that end, the parties shall follow this Court's pre-conference procedures as set forth in that Order. See id.At that conference, moreover, Ohmygatosla should also be prepared to show cause as to why it should be permitted to proceed without counsel in this action. As the Court has explained in prior Orders, in general, corporate entities may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel, see Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007), and where such an entity"repeatedly fails to appear by counsel, a default judgment may be entered against it," Grace v. Bank Leumi Tr. Co. of N.Y., 443 F.3d 180, 192 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). That said, although "courts generally do not allow corporations, partnerships, associations, and other artificial entities to appear in court without an attorney," courts have "allow[ed] sole proprietorships to proceed pro se because a sole proprietorship has no legal existence apart from its owner." Scales v. Design Nortex, No. 23-CV-6442 (LTS), 2024 WL 21909, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2024) (internal quotation marks omitted). Thus, if Ohmygatosla is not a sole proprietorship and appears at the conference without counsel, the Court may deem it to be in default. The Clerk of Court is ordered to mail a copy of this Order to Defendants Shameen Aslam d/b/a StitchSpire, Narges Tankbris d/b/a JooJooArtStore, and Ohmygatosla. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/27/2026)

ORDER SCHEDULING DEFAULT JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND SHOW CAUSE HEARING, It is hereby ORDERED that the Subject Defendants, see ECF No. 176, at 3, shall file any opposition to the motion for default judgment by April 24, 2026. Defendants are cautioned that corporate entities may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel, see Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007), and where such an entity "repeatedly fails to appear by counsel, a default judgment may be entered against it," Grace v. Bank Leumi Tr. Co. of N.Y., 443 F.3d 180, 192 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). It is further ORDERED that the Subject Defendants appear and show cause before this Court on May 5, 2026, at 4:00 p.m., why an order should not be issued granting a default judgment against them. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the conference will be held remotely by telephone in accordance with Paragraph 3.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. The parties should join the conference by calling the Court's dedicated conference line at (855) 244-8681 and using access code 2303 019 3884, followed by the pound (#) key. When prompted for an attendee ID number, press the pound (#) key again. Additionally, in accordance with Paragraph 3.D of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices, the parties shall file on ECF a joint letter, described below, as well as a proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order attached as an exhibit to the joint letter, no later than Thursday of the week prior to the initial pretrial conference. The parties shall use this Court's form Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, which is also available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman. The joint letter shall not exceed five (5) pages, and shall provide the following information in separate paragraphs as further set forth in this Order. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff serve Defendant with a copy of this Order within one business day of its filing and file proof of service on the docket within two business days of service. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 4/24/2026, Telephone Conference set for 5/5/2026 at 04:00 PM before Judge Jesse M. Furman.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/6/26)

ORDER terminating [113] Motion for Entry of Default ; granting in part and denying in part [118] Motion to Vacate. Application GRANTED in part. The Court's October 1, 2025, ECF No. 117, order is hereby VACATED. The request for entry of a certificate of default is referred to the Clerk of Court, which should treat the motion filed at ECF No. 113 as a request for that relief. See also ECF Nos. 108-09. (Plaintiff should ensure that future requests for the Clerk to enter certificates of default are filed in accordance the the ECF Rules & Instructions.) The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF Nos. 113 and 118. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/3/25) (yv) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

ORDER SCHEDULING DEFAULT JUDGMENT BRIEFING AND SHOW CAUSE HEARING, It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants shall file any opposition to the motion for default judgment by October 29, 2025. Defendants are cautioned that corporate entities may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel, see Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007), and where such an entity "repeatedly fails to appear by counsel, a default judgment may be entered against it," Grace v. Bank Leumi Tr. Co. of N.Y., 443 F.3d 180, 192 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). It is further ORDERED that Defendants appear and show cause before this Court on November 13, 2025, at 2:30 p.m., why an order should not be issued granting a default judgment against Defendants. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, the conference will be held remotely by telephone in accordance with Paragraph 3.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. The parties should join the conference by calling the Court's dedicated conference line at (855) 244-8681 and using access code 2303 019 3884, followed by the pound (#) key. When prompted for an attendee ID number, press the pound (#) key again. No later than Thursday the week prior to the conference date, Plaintiff must file the proposed default judgment order electronically, using the ECF Filing Event "Proposed Default Judgment," for the Clerk's approval. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff serve Defendants by appropriate means with (1) a copy of the motion for default judgment and all supporting papers; and (2) a copy of this Order within two business days from the date of this Order. Within three business days of service, Plaintiff must file proof of such service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 10/29/2025, Telephone Conference set for 11/13/2025 at 02:30 PM before Judge Jesse M. Furman.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/1/25)

MEMO ENDORSED ORDER on re: [48] Letter Refiling of Documents Previously Filed Under Seal filed by Fox Shiver LLC terminating [46] Motion for TRO. ENDORSEMENT: Duly noted. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 46. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/1/25)

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [4] EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Leave to file under seal granted under 25-mc-147. REFILE OF DOCUMENTS PREVIOUSLY FILED UNDER SEAL. Document filed by Fox Shiver LLC.

ORDER granting [24] Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application GRANTED. When serving the TRO on Defendants, Plaintiff must also serve this endorsed letter on Defendants. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 24. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/8/2025)

***SELECTED PARTIES*** ORDER granting [4] Motion for TRO. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 4, and to docket this Order on ECF with the "ex parte" viewing restriction, which restricts viewing to the filing party and the Court. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/23/2025)

***EX-PARTE***DECLARATION of Dmitry Lapin in Support re: 4 EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Leave to file under seal granted under 25-mc-147. Document filed by XYZ Corp. Motion or Order to File Under Seal: 147.

***EX-PARTE***DECLARATION of REDACTED in Support re: 4 EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Leave to file under seal granted under 25-mc-147. Document filed by XYZ Corp. Motion or Order to File Under Seal: 147.

***EX-PARTE***SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 4 EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Leave to file under seal granted under 25-mc-147. Document filed by XYZ Corp. Motion or Order to File Under Seal: 147.

***EX-PARTE***DECLARATION of Dmitry Lapin in Support re: [4] EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Leave to file under seal granted under 25-mc-147. Document filed by XYZ Corp. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Alert Websites, # (2) Exhibit B - Translated Alert Websites)Motion or Order to File Under Seal: [147].

***EX-PARTE***DECLARATION of REDACTED in Support re: [4] EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Leave to file under seal granted under 25-mc-147. Document filed by XYZ Corp. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Copyright Registrations, # (2) Exhibit B - Subject Defendants, # (3) Exhibit C - Comparisons)Motion or Order to File Under Seal: [147].

***EX-PARTE***EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Leave to file under seal granted under 25-mc-147. Document filed by XYZ Corp.Motion or Order to File Under Seal: [147]. (Refer to ECF Rule 13.19(b) and (c) for directions regarding promptly alerting the court to this filing.