MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: As plaintiff proposes 69, the next status report is due by and including November 13, 2026. Mailed notice
Revelyst Operations, LLC v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
案件进展
68 条记录STATUS Report by Revelyst Operations, LLC
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: As plaintiff proposes 67, the next status report is due by and including October 16, 2026. Mailed notice
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's Motion for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) 65 is denied without prejudice for the following reasons. First, as explained in ¶ 4 of this court's Standing Order in "Schedule A" Cases, Dkt. No. 16, the court cannot resolve the motion without receiving admissible translations of the significant amount of Chinese-language material attached as exhibits to the instant motion. See Dkt. Nos. [65-1] to [65-4]. Second, plaintiff's citation to Judge Wood's minute entry and default judgment in Celine SA v. Sched. A Defs., No. 26-cv-1356 (N.D. Ill.) (Dkt. Nos. 36, 39, 40), is unilluminating because the docket sheet does not reflect the basis of Judge Wood's ruling. Third, plaintiff appears to have narrowed through investigation defendant's physical address to one of two addresses in China. See QCC Search Result, Dkt. No. [65-3] at 2; Baidu Search Result, Dkt. No. [65-3] at 6. If plaintiff refiles its motion, it must explain, if it can do so, why it should not be required, as part of its duty of reasonable diligence, to send a process server or investigator to check the addresses putatively associated with defendant. See Liao v. Sweetrear, 2026 WL 2333716, at *1-2 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 12, 2026) (Gottschall, J.). Mailed notice
原告申请缺席判决MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Plaintiff's Motion for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: As the plaintiff proposes, the next status report is due by and including September 18, 2026. On the court's own motion, the court extends the deadline for effectuating service to September 18, 2026. The August 12, 2026, status report deadline is stricken. Mailed notice
STATUS Report Initial Status Report by Revelyst Operations, LLC
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: In its memorandum of law 61 filed July 28, 2026, plaintiff clarifies that it is not seeking "to enact a freeze upon Defendant's financial accounts. to preserve statutory relief, but rather to preserve the Defendant's assets until an equitable accounting can be concluded through discovery so as to return to Plaintiff any profits directly tied to the sale of infringing products." Mem. 3. The apparent inconsistent arguments made by plaintiff before issuance of the preliminary injunction, Dkt. No. 53 at 3-4, have not been explained (plaintiff devotes nearly the entirety of its supplemental memorandum to arguing collateral matters, such as whether and in what circumstances post-judgment remedies will be available if it prevails). Regardless, based on plaintiff's clarifications in the instant memorandum 61, the record now adequately supports maintaining the asset freeze imposed by the preliminary injunction. Accordingly, the preliminary injunction 57 stands. The show-cause order 58 dated July 23, 2026, is discharged. Mailed notice.
MEMORANDUM by Revelyst Operations, LLC Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum in Support of a Pre-Judgment Asset Restraint
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's Motion for a One-Day Extension of Time 59 is granted. Mailed notice
MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC for extension of time Plaintiff's Motion for a One-Day Extension of Time to File a Memorandum in Support of a Pre-Judgment Asset Restraint
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: It has come to the court's attention that in moving for a preliminary injunction, plaintiff contended that freezing defendant's assets was appropriate because "[d]efendant may attempt to move any assets from any accounts in U.S.-based financial institutions to offshore accounts. The amount of damages to which Plaintiff is entitled as set forth in the Amended Complaint most likely exceeds any amount contained in any of the Defendant's frozen accounts." Mem. Supp. Mot. Prelim. Inj. 4-5, Dkt. No. 53. In making this argument, plaintiff departed from its position at the temporary restraining order stage, where it argued that defendant's assets should have been frozen to preserve its right to an equitable accounting. Mem. Supp. Mot. for TRO 23, Dkt. No. 32. Supreme Court caselaw makes pellucid that a pre-judgment asset freeze may not be imposed solely to protect a plaintiff's ability to collect any money judgment it obtains. Grupo Mexicano de Desarollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, 527 U.S. 308, 319-25 (1999); CSC Holdings, Inc. v. Redisi, 309 F.3d 988, 996 (7th Cir. 2002). Plaintiff is therefore given until and including July 27, 2026, to tell the court any reason why the portion of the preliminary injunction freezing defendant's assets should not be dissolved. See O'Sullivan v. City of Chicago, 396 F.3d 843, 860 (7th Cir. 2005).Mailed notice
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 7/13/2026. Mailed notice
法院批准初步禁令MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: The court having received no request for a hearing by the deadline 49, the preliminary injunction hearing set for July 14, 2026, is stricken. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 52 is granted. Enter preliminary injunction order. The next status report is due on or before August 12, 2026. Mailed notice
法院批准初步禁令DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for preliminary injunction 52
原告提交PI申请MEMORANDUM by Revelyst Operations, LLC in support of motion for preliminary injunction 52
原告提交PI申请MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC for preliminary injunction Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction
原告提交PI申请MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: In view of the facts that the court has entered an ex parte temporary restraining order and no appearance of defendant is on file, the court on its own initiative extends to and including August 3, 2026, the deadline to file a joint initial status report. Mailed notice
ORDER To Extend The Temporary Restraining Order (Amended). Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 6/26/2026. Mailed notice
法院批准TROMINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Enter amended order to correct a scrivener's error in the time of the tentative setting of a preliminary injunction hearing. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a). For avoidance of doubt, a preliminary injunction hearing is tentatively set for July 14, 2026, at 11:00 AM Central Time. Mailed notice
ORDER To Extend The Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 6/26/2026. Mailed notice
法院批准TROMINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's Ex-Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order 44 is granted to and including July 14, 2026. If at any time the defendant appears and objects, the court will reconsider this TRO extension. Enter Order. The June 30, 2026, preliminary injunction hearing is stricken. A preliminary injunction hearing is tentatively set for July 14, 2026, at 11:00 AM. The court will rule on any preliminary injunction motion without holding a hearing unless a hearing is requested at least 48 hours before the time of the scheduled hearing. Mailed notice
法院批准TROCERTIFICATE of Service by Elizabeth Aubree Miller on behalf of Revelyst Operations, LLC
MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC for extension of time Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order
原告提交TRO申请SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 6/16/2026. Mailed notice
法院批准TROMINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: The deadline 36 of June 15, 2026, to object to, or request a hearing on, plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order has come and gone, and nothing has been received. Upon consideration of the certificate of service 37 filed June 8, 2026, plaintiff's motion 31 for entry of a sealed temporary restraining order is granted. Enter sealed temporary restraining order. Any motion for preliminary injunction must be filed on or before June 25, 2026. A preliminary injunction hearing to be held by teleconference is tentatively set for June 30, 2026, at 11:00 AM. The court will rule on any preliminary injunction motion without holding a hearing unless a hearing is requested at least 48 hours before the time of the scheduled hearing. A hearing may be requested by contacting Judge Gottschall's courtroom deputy at Chambers_Gottschall@ilnd.uscourts.gov.Mailed notice
法院批准TROMINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's Second Motion for Leave to File Under Seal 40 is granted. Mailed notice
MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC to seal document Plaintiff's Second Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
SEALED ORDER Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 6/8/2026. Mailed notice
CERTIFICATE of Service by Elizabeth Aubree Miller on behalf of Revelyst Operations, LLC
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limits 30 is granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery 35 is granted. Enter order authorizing limited discovery. Plaintiff has filed an ex parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 31, but plaintiff does not represent that it gave notice of this motion to the third-party service provider named in the proposed temporary restraining order emailed to the court on June 5, 2026. See Standing Order in "Schedule A" Cases ¶ 6, Dkt. No. 16 (citations omitted). Plaintiff is instructed to send the third-party providers notice of its motion and this minute order in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. The third-party providers have until and including June 15, 2026, to object to, or request a hearing on, plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order. A hearing may be requested by emailing Chambers_Gottschall@ilnd.uscourts.gov and copying all counsel of record. Plaintiff must file a supplemental certificate of service on or before June 9, 2026. In addition, plaintiff filed several exhibits under seal without an accompanying Local Rule 26.2 motion to seal. Plaintiff has until and including June 15, 2026, to file a motion to seal to avoid unsealing. Mailed notice
法院批准TROMOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC to expedite Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Miller Declaration
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Exhibit 2 to Mills Declaration regarding memorandum in support of motion, 32
MEMORANDUM by Revelyst Operations, LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 31
原告提交TRO申请MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication
原告提交TRO申请MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Amended Schedule A
AMENDED complaint by Revelyst Operations, LLC against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto
ORDER Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 5/12/2026. Mailed notice
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Enter Order denying without prejudice plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery [Dkt. No. 23] and finding that plaintiff has not carried its burden on this record to show that joinder of defendants is proper. By June 3, 2026, plaintiff may either amend its complaint to omit all improperly joined defendants or renew its motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery. In either case, plaintiff must make a prima facie case that the court has personal jurisdiction over any defendant named in the amended complaint. Mailed notice
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Exhibit A regarding memorandum 24
MEMORANDUM by Revelyst Operations, LLC Memorandum in Response to the April 30, 2026 Order [Dkt. No. 17]
MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC to expedite Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's motion 21 for a one-day extension to and including May 8, 2026, of its deadline to file a memorandum of law regarding joinder of the defendants is granted. Mailed notice
MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC for extension of time Plaintiff's Motion for a First Extension of Time to File a Response to the April 30, 2026 Order [Dkt. No. 17]
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Exhibit 2 Part 2 of Mills Declaration regarding declaration[18]
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Exhibit 2 Part 1 of Mills Declaration regarding declaration[18]
DECLARATION of Paul Mills
ORDER Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 4/30/2026. Mailed notice
STANDING ORDER IN "SCHEDULE A" CASES Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 4/30/2026. Mailed notice
ORDER: A joint initial status report is due on or before July 1, 2026. Counsel and parties are directed to familiarize themselves with Judge Gottschall's case procedures, which are available from the court's website at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/. To locate the case procedures, Follow the "judges" link, and select "Hon. Joan B. Gottschall." Please pay particular attention to the requirement to exchange initial disclosures within fourteen days of the parties' initial discovery planning conference and the court's requirement that the parties are to explore settlement opportunities and identify areas of agreement before filing the joint initial status report. Signed by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 4/30/2026. Mailed notice
和解/判决执行进展MINUTE entry before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal 8 is granted. Mailed notice
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Revelyst Operations, LLC
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Revelyst Operations, LLC
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Sealed Schedule A
MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by Elizabeth Aubree Miller
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by John Wilson
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by Robert Payton Mcmurray
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by William Benjamin Kalbac
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by Michael A. Hierl
CIVIL Cover Sheet
COMPLAINT filed by Revelyst Operations, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25045730.
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
