Judgment - AO450
NewWave Holdings, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
案件进展
42 条记录Default Judgment
Order on Motion for Entry of Default
原告申请缺席判决Entry of Default
ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/31/2025: Mailed notice.
Preliminary Injunction
Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction
原告提交PI申请MOTION by Plaintiff NewWave Holdings, LLC for preliminary injunction
原告提交PI申请Order on Motion for Extension of Time
Extension of Time
SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 10/29/2025. Mailed notice
法院批准TROMINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery [32], and motion for electronic service of process [35] are granted as to Amended Schedule A. Plaintiff's filings support proceeding on an ex parte basis at this time. Specifically, and were defendant to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, the Court finds that it is likely that defendant's assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendant, stopping defendant's infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods, and there is no countervailing harm to defendant from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendant and to implement the asset freeze. The 12/19/25 tracking status hearing stands. Mailed notice
法院批准TROService by Publication
Temporary Restraining Order
Amended Complaint
ORDER Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 10/16/2025. Mailed notice
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Memorandum in Support of Joinder (Unredacted)
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Exhibit A to Redacted Memorandum in Support of Joinder
MEMORANDUM set deadlines/hearings, 21 by John Doe Memorandum in Support of Joinder (Redacted)
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings. Plaintiff's motions to seal 4, for a temporary restraining order 11, and motion for electronic service 16 are entered and continued. Upon review of the complaint and the TRO submissions, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of almost 300 defendants in this case. See, e.g. Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D.Ill. 2020). By 6/30/25, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a smaller subset of defendants along with its memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. Status hearing is set for 8/1/25 at 9:00 a.m. to track (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice
法院批准TROMEMORANDUM by John Doe in support of motion for service by publication 19
MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe for service by publication
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Declaration of Plaintiff in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
原告提交TRO申请SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe MEMORANDUM in support of motion for temporary restraining order 15 (Unredacted)
原告提交TRO申请MEMORANDUM by John Doe in support of motion for temporary restraining order 15 (Redacted)
原告提交TRO申请MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe for temporary restraining order
原告提交TRO申请MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Daliah Saper
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Brandon Matthew Beymer
MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe to seal document sealed document 4, sealed document 2, sealed document, 6, sealed document 3, sealed document 8
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Notice of Trademark Claim
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by John Doe
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Complaint (Unredacted)
CIVIL Cover Sheet
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Schedule A to the Redacted Complaint
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Exhibit 2 to the Redacted Complaint
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff John Doe Exhibit 1 to the Redacted Complaint
COMPLAINT (Redacted) filed by John Doe; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23486421.
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
